Based on the HK Fact Sheet on Jan 2011

We divide the age group starting 0-14, 15-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64 and 65 above

Here are the population

0-14 = 12.5%

15-24 = 12.8%

25-34 = 15.4%

35-44 = 16.8%

45-54 = 18.3%

55-64 = 11.6%

65 & over = 12.8%

The upward trend starts from the age group 0-14 to 45-54 and drop at the retirement age 55-64.  Who need a larger flat from 2 bed rooms to 3 bed rooms in next 10 years? Probably the age group 25-34 & 35-44 are alike.

I think the data supplied by DT is trustworthy irrespective of his/her grammatical mistakes in each sentence.

I agree with DT's point. I would say that if HK Gov't does not do anything to boost the population though immigration scheme, it is very likely that the actual demand of large property will shrink. As a result, the property price will level off or even decline in the long run.

50後，都上岸了，兒女長大，各自生活，並計劃退休，只會賣了大屋，換小屋。

60後，生活穩定，兒女出身，有多餘的錢，可以投放在物業，作為儲蓄或投資，換「假豪宅」者，多數是這些人。

70後，結了婚，生了兩名化骨龍，要住名校區，方便子女入學。又要換有三間房的樓，要「升呢」，至少三百多萬。不過，如果已上了車的話，不用太擔心，首期一定有著落。公一份婆一份，供樓沒有太大問題。

80後，想先買樓才結婚，就要向靠雙方家長集資做首期。如果家長沒有能力，或等七年，並且要踫運氣，「抽」居屋。抽到了，可能要搬入大嶼山或沙頭角附近住，去香港仔返工，這是代價。所以「租樓」不是下策。

90後，等下先啦。或者十年後，香港又遇到另一個波浪，市區樓和豪宅大平賣，任你揀。