懷念龍門陣，懷念當年敢作敢為的亞視，反對亞視淪為中共口舌，政治打壓香港人！

Similar attitude of the ruling party in our neighboring country, everything wrong is not their false, is it caused by external factors.

They will never have introspection.

They don't make good use of the money to do something constructive, e.g. education in rural area,  improving social society.

They squander the money of their tax payer, doing nothing meaningful. And the outcome is "too tragic" to look at.

一如九十年代中進軍報業的蘋果日報，為行業帶來新衝擊，結果是使所有參與者力求在質素上更上一層樓，明顯是良性競爭的行業。

??

蘋果日日洗腦wor!

競爭才有進步，壟斷一定對社會不利。

Did you see the video of the ATV.

盛品儒said: "明報不明  信報無信  蘋果就欄左"  Sure, those kind of media are the eyesores to someone.

If Apple Daily was brainwashing others, i would have to say, ATV doesn't even have the ability to make the Audience to press a button of the remote in their hand to change from watching TVB to ATV

過去數年，免費電視的整體廣告收入不升反跌，最大原因係新媒體湧現，分了廣告市場一杯羹，加上TVB一台獨大，無良性競爭之下，咁就會少做少改少革新，節目每每重複以住成功經驗，抱殘守缺不以為忤。

而 ATV 收視威也都吊唔起，營運者另有盤算，可能買個台當玩具，以增加政治本錢都唔定。

但話時話一次攪多叁個牌出來亦唔係講玩，後生仔又越來越少人睇電視，基哥發到咁大來攪，真係要祝佢好運致得。

一言蔽之：哀其不幸，怒其不爭；今日亞視，明日黃花。

說得不錯,真的心痛!!!

As HK citizens, we welcome for competition and expecting the high quality program.

Why HK government not yet release the license ???  they not disclose any issue behind.

ATV was so funny yesterday... especially the dancing. Good try!

競爭者都唔怕輸，政府點解要控制供應呢？自由經濟，應該提供充裕供應，不應控制供應，由得他們自由競爭吧，自然會汰弱留強，但政府角色應該係確保無限供應，任人競爭，社會才有進步，市民才會得益。

香港的電視台根本沒有競爭，依然是一台獨大。電視節目是香港人最常看的娛樂，但現在兩台都有自我審查，甚至利用大氣電波獻媚，某程度上為政府，中共給香港人洗䐉，雖然多一個電視台未必一定改變現況，起碼有個希望。

這裡競爭都不足夠，全部爛文都係地剷佬寫的，賣花贊花香。

To be honest, I really do not know what ATV has done in these a few years. I was surprised why they can still survive. I am no interested in their programs at all. About 10 years before, I was used to watch programs in both ATV/ Chinese and ATV/ English. Now, they just show some rubbish programs in both channels and you will be puzzled by their schedule. In fact, they have no schedule at all. It seems that they air the programs 'randomly'.

在控制言論競爭之下，這裡千篇一率地產佬文章，質素每況愈下。