|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1. TOM 2012-06-07 11:57:20
|
|
如此差勁的報告, 可以收如此高昂的費用, 這就是那些所謂議員經常要求成立特別小組調查東調查西, 小事化大的原因!
|
|
2. Marco 2012-06-07 12:10:40
|
|
香港政府成曰往后看，然而发展应向前看！向好的方向发展！ 政棍们亦只识叫口号，不做实事！以致政策议而不决，决而不行！严重拖慢香港的发展！
|
|
3. 亮劍----王先生 2012-06-07 12:49:52
|
|
係四五年前，如果邊條友走出來話雷曼會倒閉！ 百份百俾人當係傻仔！！ 如果講嘅人係任志剛，引起外交風波都得！！ 銀行職員判斷錯誤，自己買左嗰啲有毒證券之外，仲「好心地」介紹俾親朋好友及相熟客户，有錢齊齊揾，係當時好普遍！！ 大眾智慧就係呢間雷曼唔會有事，如果有事都會有人睇數拆掂拒！！ 就有如你話長實同匯豐會執，香港人會點諗一樣！！！
|
|
4. 亮劍----王先生 2012-06-07 12:51:48
|
|
|
|
|
5. 80後銀行從業員 2012-06-07 12:52:41
|
|
真正要負責任的, 只是雷曼迷債的投資者而己. 我不排除有部份人被誤導或銀行違規銷售. 但絕大部份均是投資高手, 或者起碼自認為是高手. 所以雷曼苦主是咎由自取, 一點也不值得同情.
|
|
6. mini 2012-06-07 13:06:42
|
|
Fully agreed. Quite often we received many calls/ messages for buying any investment products or for borrowing at an extra low interest rates for particularing in stocks or other structural financial products. We must ask ourselves what's that for ? Each buyer should know what it is before taking any decision. Do Not Pass All the Responsibility on to the others. It's not fair !
|
|
7. Agree no.5 2012-06-07 13:33:12
|
|
|
|
|
8. 垃圾會議員目的 2012-06-07 13:39:55
|
|
|
|
|
9. 任志剛 2012-06-07 13:41:44
|
|
|
|
|
10. Hongkong People 2012-06-07 14:58:20
|
|
Fully agreed with "Chung Tat".
|
|
11. 平反 2012-06-07 18:06:11
|
|
一個電視廣告: 女主角: 我人工二萬, XX銀行都肯借三十萬俾我冚卡數. (面上流露出感恩的表情)
|
|
12. CD ROM 2012-06-07 23:47:06
|
|
I really wanna ask, for those from the rest of the world who suffered from LB, had been helped by govern't to get back their investment capital ???
|
|
13. Hongkong People 2012-06-08 00:00:29
|
|
To CD Rom,
I think most people who bought mini bond can get 80 -90% of their investment. But some people bought other structured products related to LB might not get back their investment.
HKMA actually gave lots of pressure to banks to make this happen and frankly speaking, it was not a good precedent set for the future. |
|
14. 看化 2012-06-08 00:04:00
|
|
所有雷曼苦主都唔識字，被人誤導，真可憐。 但有一個字一定要識，就係個〝醜〞字。
|
|
15. BBQ 2012-06-08 00:20:15
|
|
|
|
|
16. X觀點 2012-06-08 00:38:28
|
|
|
|
|
17. 二馬九日 2012-06-08 10:51:14
|
|
市民就是對金融產品認識不足才需要有強大資源能力的政府去為市民去監管， 外國政府已列這些產品不能在銀行銷售， 在外國有無雷曼苦主上街， 星架玻的政府如何處理， 任志剛有功，每年千萬薪金，已拿過億， 他不是神，會犯錯，錯要負責。 政府錯、銀行錯、市民錯，即是三方有錯， 各負多少責任呢？ 好多時都聽到法庭判決，一件交通意外車主、行人負多少車禍責任， 為何雷曼事件要市民完全承擔， 不要忘記還有數千名雷曼相關產品，一仙也沒收到賠償， 他們連去銀行門口抗議的權利也受禁制， 官商勾結，請不要為虎作倀！
|
|
18. 利港人 2012-06-08 11:32:03
|
|
昨天事忙，無時間留言，今天補回。 任總盡心盡力為香港是人所共知的事，神仙都難救，何況不是神仙的任總？ 香港人，最鍾意輸打贏要，連今日利世民專欄都鬧份報告啦。 輸唔起，就唔好玩，玩都要小注怡情，唔好淨係怪銀行怪社會怪政府，呢種心態好唔健康！
|
|
19. PN 2012-06-08 12:18:15
|
|
Let put it this way. Nothing is risk-free! You are just taking risks that you are not aware of or you feel comfortable with. You may say HK goviernment bond is risk free consider we have so much foreign currency reserve + budget surplus etc. You know what, in the credit derivatives market, if you need to buy USD 1,000,000 worth of 5 Years protection (insurance) on USD obligations (say debts) issued by HK government, you need to pay USD 7,457 every year (or USD 37,285) for full period. You think this is a good deal to sell such insurance and collect the USD 37k for 5 years yeah? (ah.....that was what the Mini-bond buyers had in their mind when they bought the bonds <in case they understand the product>)
|
|
20. mrs0988 2012-06-09 10:08:59
|
|
|
|
|
21. 天天 2012-06-09 10:32:48
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
