| 瀏覽人次：15303
回應：44
|
今天的香港，使人既熟悉又陌生。
熟悉的，是港人仍然熱愛這個中西匯合、文化多元的香港；陌生的，乃是非顛倒、政策扭曲、傳媒偏頗、鬥爭內耗無日無之，使人唏噓。
今天，如果你要教導下一代是非黑白，越來越困難：傳媒一面倒地以同情及支持泛民及佔中份子的態度來報導他們的行動，如上星期七一大遊行後部份激烈人士參加所謂預演佔中，不理警方的警告，一直逗留至翌日早上，結果511人被捕。違反不反對通知書，非法集會，阻礙社會正常運作，肯定是非法行為，但部份暢銷的泛民報章標題卻指「歷史將判他們無罪」，又將警察拘捕示威者的行為醜化、指警方賤招盡出，又引述「香港良心」陳方安生指警方與民為敵云云。
香港的核心價值，包括言論自由、新聞自由、集會及遊行示威自由，惟自由不能無限延伸，得在不影響他人的情況下享受自由。例如每個人都有聽音樂的自由，但假如某人在凌晨仍在家中以極大音量播放音樂，嚴重影響鄰居休息，就剝奪了鄰居安靜休息的自由，肯定不對，亦是違法；同樣地，無論佔領中環份子如何辯稱他們的行為充滿「愛與和平」、「為港犧牲」、「抗赤化」，實際上仍是非法的，對中環帶來的影響、對打工仔、日常商業運作的影響，今次未見太多，卻已令無數政府、銀行、公司花費額外數十萬至數百萬以準備應付佔領中環一旦發生時的對策，這些成本又該算在誰的頭上？
泛民及佔中份子態度強硬，公民提名不符合基本法，他們硬要說這是國際標準，基本法寫什麼他們不理，如果政府拋出來的方案沒有公民提名就寧願原地踏步，也不要假普選。這次網上公投有80萬人次參與，他們認為很成功，是很強力的民意基礎------80萬人次是否很多？無錯，以人次來說是歷來這種「民間公投」(包括上次五區總辭變相公投)當中最多，但一來這個投票的驗證方法有明顯漏洞、數字有水份，二來以泛民傳媒的影響力、日日夜夜發動輿論攻勢，相比合資格的「選民」，都只得如此少數「選民」參與公投，實際數字亦遠較立法會選舉中投票給泛民主派的選民為低，可見不是所有泛民支持者都支持公民提名必不可少。
大家不要忘記，泛民所指不應「袋住先」的假普選，在早前明報所造的民意調查顯示，有57%受訪者接受普選方案只要有一人一票，即使排拒泛民候選人入閘也可接受，堅拒接受者僅28%，證明民意着重一人一票遠高於公民提名，泛民及佔中份子寧願原地踏步，有違大多數的民意，今次公投他們未有參與，很可能是不滿泛民及佔中份子的取態，以致實際投票數字遠較立法會選舉中投票給泛民主派的選民為低。
最後想提醒各位，泛民經常表示不要假普選，不理基本法，要推倒重來：1990年，香港GDP佔中國GDP 約25%，今天呢？僅2%而已，而且還在不斷下降！推倒重來，只會對本港更不利。
泛民及佔中的支持者，瞓醒未？
一言蔽之：佔中漠視大多數，騎劫民意扮清高。
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Peter Paker 2014-07-07 09:03:10
|
|
|
|
|
2. 什麼是法治？ 2014-07-07 09:19:42
|
|
500人公民抗命犯法，被捕，無反抗無逃走，呢D係法治精神既體現（原監警會主席翟紹棠都係咁講）。 2個人犯法，證據確鑿，仍然講大話，扺賴，轉移視線，向執法部門施壓，叫傳媒收醒，最後令自己無事，呢D先係法治崩壞。 如年輕人分享唔到經濟成果，甚至會因為香港經濟好樓價高令佢地更冇機會，咁香港佔中國經濟2%定係50%根本係冇分別（甚至係香港經濟好佢地先係受害人！）
|
|
|
年輕人分享唔到經濟成果?
不如立法, 一滿21歲就送一間屋俾佢地好唔好?
依家新界仲有大把三百萬的樓...
大學畢業基本上人工都過萬....
當佢兩公婆一人一萬五人工, 根本唔使四年就儲夠錢上車,
咁都叫分享唔到經濟成果?
收入少咪努力啲賺錢, 儲唔到錢就玩少啲食平啲
如果連咁都做唔到, 零付出學乜人話分享成果?
|
|
4. 中國實質GDP增長不多於香港 2014-07-07 11:31:24
|
|
會計仔 blog http://accountboyhk.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=5098328 中國第一季的GDP增長是7.4%, 這個7.4%所謂勝過預期或是差於預期, 對我來說, 其實沒有什麼意義, 因為我一向都是覺得這GDP是假的。 假的地方在於通漲率, 即是名義GDP增加至少有80%是真的, 可能有8%上下, 但通漲率長期都是假的, 真實的通漲率長期於5-10%之間, 而不是3%, 所以真實的GDP增長應該是0-3%上下, 而不是7-8%。而通漲造假的原因, 就是因為當年25%的官方通漲引起了天安門64事件, 怕了。
|
|
5. 萬5人工上車？唔使比錢老母？一定有女友夾手供？ 2014-07-07 11:35:33
|
|
有萬5人工既女都想找個三萬既男友啦！問題係人地連女都未有！ 以政府D咁PK既政策，發展商只會建貴樓，四年後上車盤樓價又係另一回事。 （申利：我大80後小小，有幾間樓，唔係費青，但算係了解佢地既上司） |
|
6. PN 2014-07-07 11:35:37
|
|
Should be re-written as:年輕人分享唔到<前人辛苦勞碌所種下的>經濟成果?
|
|
7. 有老豆老母比首期就係 2014-07-07 11:38:04
|
|
> 年輕人分享唔到<前人辛苦勞碌所種下的>經濟成果?以前仲有好多low-hanging fruit, 6百萬樓都可以9成按，冇壓測，既得利益者唔好講風涼話了。 |
|
8. 葉子 2014-07-07 12:12:05
|
|
明知唔夠地, 點解 年輕人又要反對發展新界東北...
第時樓價貴唔好又係到嘈呀...一切都係自己攞黎 |
|
9. 亮劍 2014-07-07 12:18:16
|
|
今年3 月久不露面的李嘉誠，一出聲就大篇幅談香港未來。 這些年，超人的確能從經濟層面摸清香港的發展脈絡，給香港把脈他游刃有餘。 李嘉誠說：香港是寵壞的孩子，照此下去五六年就面目全非。 香港其實不是沒有機會，只看識唔識抓住機會。 李克強說，要推動新一輪對外開放，在國際市場中搏擊風浪，倒逼深層次改革和結構調整。 而梁振英亦在兩會期間拜會國資委，冀望國企在香港設立亞太區總部。 難道這不是不謀而合的機會？香港何不用多年在國際商圈叱咤的經驗，引領內地國企借船出海。 由此，中環難不受益。就連李嘉誠也說，近年內地一些大城市迅速發展，我們要懂得別些地區的潛力，化為自己的「東風」，得與競爭對手並駕齊驅。 李嘉誠還說，香港經濟與十年前已不可同日而語。 過去，香港領着內地走，現在要背靠內地。 李克強就說，要進一步擴大內地與港澳合作，促進港澳自身競爭力提升。 在國家全面深化改革和現代化進程中，香港、澳門一定會實現更好發展。 香港不是不能在內地改革創新開放發展的階段發熱發亮。幫助內地也好、借助內地也罷，獲益的都是香港的GDP。 奈何現下部分人費心撕裂社會卻不願合力發展社會。 香港同澳門於回歸祖國前的人均GDP，前者遠超後者，但澳門在呢十多年勵精圖治，香港就玩空轉，人均GDP已經互換其位，請問肥佬泥你玩夠未?
|
|
10. nobody 2014-07-07 12:30:09
|
|
仲達sir可以google下Thomas Piketty本21世紀資本論，簡單來講，就係資本回報高過人力回報，咁無論經濟增長幾多，有資本（如樓）班人所得到既比例都越來越大，只有人力既新鮮人所得既越來越小，即係所謂crowding out effect，所以話"經濟增長成果"，其實係對佢地不利的。 李嘉誠話訓唔著，其實都係呢樣野。 |
|
11. 朗晴 2014-07-07 12:34:52
|
|
七一遊行：警察協會發聲明
致會員：
在過去三、四個星期，香港警隊再一次接受維持香港社會治安穩定的挑戰。代表着警隊基層兩萬多人員的香港警察隊員佐級協會，我們大部分的會員，均有參與2014年7月1日在香港島處理大型遊行，或其後處理部分人士進行的非法集會的工作。我們都親身目擊有人故意拖慢遊行速度，亦有人推倒維持交通暢順和社會秩序的鐵馬，做成社會混亂和危害其他道路使用者的場面。在處理遮打道非法集會時，在無數攝影機和相機下，我們親耳聽到有人公然誣衊警察濫用武力。在過百記者朋友自由採訪下，有人亂講警察打壓新聞自由。我親眼見到同事們，是如何處理遊行和非法集會，他們是忍耐、關懷、憤慨和忘我。他們忍耐着無理的指責，他們關懷着香港的治安穩定，和所有人包括參與非法集會人士的安全。他們的憤慨，因為希望將尋釁滋事者和破壞治安者，將之繩之於法而激起的憤慨。他們在執行長時間維持治安工作時，為了忠於職務，已經忘記了辛勞，甚至有同事體力耗盡，仍再次鼓起勇氣，抖擻精神，為恢復社會秩序而努力。
我們是依法執行維持香港治安的工作。我們希望社會大衆明白，香港警察執法的目的，只是希望生活在香港的所有人，都能夠在一個安全的社會上生活。對於有立法會和監警會的成員，在事件未查清楚前，批評我們濫用職權、濫用武力。他們處事如此偏頗魯莽，隨意批評，協會表示非常失望。對於這樣處事的人的公正性，協會表示非常懷疑。
最後，我們對警隊上下充滿信心，而且有信心警隊在警隊管理層的領導下，一定可以克服任何人以任何借口破壞香港社會治安的挑戰。各位會員，我們一同努力，為我們法治的香港社會而奮鬥，讓所有在香港的人，都能夠生活在一個安定繁榮的香港。
陳祖光 香港警察隊員佐級協會 2014年7月6日
|
|
12. 上善若水 2014-07-07 13:00:57
|
|
「1990年，香港GDP佔中國GDP 約25%，今天呢？僅2%而已，而且還在不斷下降！推倒重來，只會對本港更不利。」說得很好！ GDP只反映量，還需考慮質的因素。1990年時，香港在輕工業、對外貿易、電訊服務、娛樂事業、交通建設等方面遠遠領先內地。某些金融服務、奢侈品市場更是有與無的分別。香港的文化也瘋魔全國，粵語歌、電視劇集、港式飲食、服裝曾是一代時尚。 時至今日，這些優勢已大大消退，甚至全不見了。 目前部份泛民的吵吵鬧鬧，在不少內地有識之士心目中已是劣質民主的典型。這樣下去，我們還剩多少籌碼與中央較勁？我擔心雙方日趨對立後，香港連現存的權利也保不住。
|
|
13. 東 2014-07-07 13:50:19
|
|
to 5/F
一個家不嬲都係以家庭做單位, 兩個人一齊供係好正常架事
無伴侶的話, 依家無, 唔等於依家唔可以儲錢為將來打算
四年後樓價係點無人知, 但唔等於可以用黎做放棄的藉口,
話唔定2018年樓市會比依家低呢?
|
|
14. PN 2014-07-07 14:01:25
|
|
" 以前仲有好多low-hanging fruit, 6百萬樓都可以9成按，冇壓測，既得利益者唔好講風涼話了。"
Sounds like my I did not work hard for what I have in my pocket now. Sound like it was easy to buy property years back. People only look at the price change but not the mortgage interest paid (>10% at many points in time) + evaporation of purchasing power. |
|
15. 石地堂 2014-07-07 14:21:48
|
|
To 2
先故意犯法, 然後自首, 一負一正， 最多打和， 如何稱得上 有" 法治精神 " ? ? 我看坚忍執法的前線警員才配得上你的讚賞
現在的年青人從出生一該已在享受及享用社會繁榮的福利， 為何分享不到?! 就算未分得他心中的份額, 就應該用暴力來爭取 ? 公義何在呀? ??
|
|
16. 石地堂 2014-07-07 14:27:48
|
|
"公民抗命" 是出於哪一章節的法律 ?
真像 : "革命無罪， 造返有理 "
紅衛是我們中國人歷史的一節悲劇, 請救救孩子吧！！ |
|
17. 石地堂 2014-07-07 14:28:20
|
|
|
|
|
18. Alan Pepper 2014-07-07 14:34:16
|
|
自由不能無限延伸，得在不影響他人的情況下享受自由
Good Good Good |
|
19. Alan Pepper 2014-07-07 14:47:07
|
|
7. 有老豆老母比首期就係 2014-07-07 11:38:04 >年輕人分享唔到<前人辛苦勞碌所種下的>經濟成果? 以前仲有好多low-hanging fruit, 6百萬樓都可以9成按，冇壓測，既得利益者唔好講風涼話了。
But young people should at least work hard before complaining right? If they work hard for 10 years, have a good money saving habit, get married with dual incomes and still cannot buy a home, then they complain, is that fair?
Honestly I think any educated / hard working person working 10 years with good saving habit who get married and have dual income can buy their homes without problems wor...
|
|
20. Alan Pepper 2014-07-07 14:48:22
|
|
If a person working 10 years cannot acheive $25k per month per person then he/she has to really think about their career path la...
|
|
21. Alan Pepper 2014-07-07 16:37:19
|
|
Here's a simple calculation for young generation out there:
Income Saving 1st-3rd year $10,000 $2,000 4th-6th year $15,000 $5,000 7th-10th year $20,000 $8,000
10 years = $636,000
If married = $1,272,000
30% ($1,200,000) down payment on $4 million home, $40,000 total income, mortgage $12,000 per month. This works well for young family comfortably. If you can earn more good for you, if you cannot please work harder la, at age 32 still have chance in the future, at age 45 then its a little difficult la.... |
|
22. nobody 2014-07-07 17:12:46
|
|
21世紀資本論實財。 假設當初人力同資產比例係 50:50, 如果用真實既例子，而家可能己經係20:80, 以下表計，當個trend持續15年後，D後生仔儲多一萬，樓價就升左6萬。 。大家都係明事理既人，你記唔記得10年前樓價係幾多？你話而家十年後有60萬重要有條同你一心一意又人工差唔多既女？係唔係何不食肉麾？
| 年份 | 人力資源增長＠5% | 資產增值＠8% | 經濟總值 | 資本增長比人力 | | 0.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 1.00 | | 5.00 | 63.81 | 73.47 | 137.28 | 1.15 | | 10.00 | 81.44 | 107.95 | 189.39 | 1.33 | | 15.00 | 103.95 | 158.61 | 262.55 | 1.53 | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | 年份 | 人力資源增長＠5% | 資產增值＠8% | 經濟總值 | 資本增長比人力 | | 0.00 | 20.00 | 80.00 | 100.00 | 4.00 | | 5.00 | 25.53 | 117.55 | 143.07 | 4.61 | | 10.00 | 32.58 | 172.71 | 205.29 | 5.30 | | 15.00 | 41.58 | 253.77 | 295.35 | 6.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23. 原來冇人明法治係乜！ 2014-07-07 17:20:05
|
|
A社會，一年有100綜罪案發生，但只有10綜有執法 B社會，一年有10萬綜罪案發生，9萬9千綜有執法
表面上，A社會罪案小，B罪案多，但其實B先係一個法治社會，即使B社會冇執法既例子都比A多，但B社會既人會集慣用法律解決問題，而A社會既人唔會。咁都唔明，難怪會反佔中。
|
|
24. 東 2014-07-07 17:29:21
|
|
敢問:一個大佬為左利益, 叫佢班手下去犯案;犯完之後, 又叫佢手下自首認晒, 等自己完全置身事外...咁係咪好有法治精神?
|
|
25. Alan Pepper 2014-07-07 17:36:40
|
|
To 22/F.
Yes yes. That is why I used $4 million as startkng point. Not $3 million ah.
Also these are all realistic and achievable numbers.
Please don't bring macro economic into a home purchase decision la. And when you are 32 and earn $20,000 that is also very conservative la. Many people make well over $30,000 at age 32.
Besides the government did at least stop the property prices increase for about 2 years now, so it's time to play catch up. Right?
You really cannot expect a single person making $15,000 to buy a home right? |
|
26. 石地堂 2014-07-07 17:42:50
|
|
乜乜色魔走去强姦咗個女人， 然後瞓係度比差人啦 ！仲話强姦無罪! 警察㰖用職權! 是否很有法治精神 ?
人民守法 , 為政者按法律條文做事, 就是法冶! 計一大餐數都在說謊， 真不明所以! |
|
27. 東 2014-07-07 17:56:57
|
|
To 22/F
你只舉極端的例子, 根本無意義...
你用十年前沙士價同依家, 當然升得好多.
問題係, 呢個升幅的比例, 係咪可以無限拉長?
點解你唔用97年高峰同依家比? 又唔用一年前同依家比?
樓市有週期, 就算某日樓市真係跌一半,
無樓人仕依家唔儲多啲彈藥,
到兩三年回復後, 佢地咪一樣會話 :
"呢三年升左一倍, 我人工點追?"
你又會唔會話 : "個trend持續15年, 咪會升2^5 = 32倍?"
|
|
28. PN 2014-07-07 18:00:30
|
|
Do you know there is something on this planet earth called compound interest. As such, on paper, 資產 always outgrowth 人力. If god give Jesus $1 when he was born and Jesus invested the $1 in an instrument which had an annual compounding return of 3%, then Jesus's investment now worth1 * 1.03^2014: | 71,477,697,832,255,300,000,000,000 |
But indeed national disaster, war and incorrect investment decision destroy values, like 佔中.
|
|
29. nobody 2014-07-07 18:10:09
|
|
科技都係一種資本，亦會令好多人人工點都冇得加。如果一個人唔係有某D天份，可能一世都係萬幾蚊人工，過去見到既人工升幅，只會集中好小人身上。 就算係過去好搵既專業，如會計，都有呢個問題（所以有年輕會計司夾錢登廣告反佢地老細反佔中！）
十年之內，連車都唔使人揸了,到時果D話自己揸的士供間樓既人又點回答尼？總唔係個個本來只係有能力去揸的士既人都咁叻入到google, 創辦uber呱？
我唔係話佢地做得啱，而係指出佢地既不滿係有理由，而我，甚至李嘉誠，都睇唔到出路，亦唔係話佢地唔啱，就可以叫佢地平息。 |
|
30. to pn 2014-07-07 18:14:05
|
|
資本回報唔係幾千年不變，piketty就正正指出，政變，打仗等係令人力回報提升，資本回報下跌既方法，所以佢地想佔中。
|
|
31. 小陽 2014-07-07 18:19:09
|
|
我唔係話佢地做得啱，而係指出佢地既不滿係有理由，而我，甚至李嘉誠，都睇唔到出路，亦唔係話佢地唔啱，就可以叫佢地平息。----呢句也是事實。
其實cy reject 左hk tv ----- 係最錯決定，年青人要做有創意工作，會計／銀行做到冇左士氣。
令到年青人反抗之深，唔同個個就去做公務員？
|
|
32. Alan Pepper 2014-07-07 18:55:22
|
|
To 29.
Yes yes. So you do see the problem. Yes there will be those who can obtain high income and those who don't. This is the reason one should focus on adding value, not spend time protesting correct?
When I graduated my friends work at the big 5 (now big 4) and earned $8,000 per month and worked 70 hours per week. 15 years later you ask how much they make? Rome was not built in one day. And accountant is still a high earning and sought after profession. You just have to work like a dog for the first 10 years.
Yes high earning will alway be limited to less than the majority. And do you agree that this is what elites should be paid? Or do you want a communist system? Where everyone pays the same?
Please. $20,000 per month is an extremely conservative number, it is lower than the median income. Good Accountants with 10 years experience make at least $40k if not more. |
|
33. Alan Pepper 2014-07-07 19:21:11
|
|
To nobody.
From you posts I deduce you are very young? Early to mid 20? I also assume you are hard working and see unjust in the system? If you are I hope you can differcianate between unjust that stem from the society, and unjust that is self-inflicted. If after 10 years of experience one cannot earn more than, say, 25k. Then that person should really think about what they are doing in their career. But knowing that there is a safety net in HK for low income earners one should at least have peace of mind. If you earn under $20k and wish to marry a wife or husband without income (I. E. Without the same "vision" as you) then you really have a problem. Isn't it? These problems are self inflicted and is not unjust in the society.
If however your salary is limited to $10k by force and there is no way to climb up in the ladder no matter how hard you work, how innovative you are, then that is a society problem. But that is also called extreme communism, which China had abandoned 30 years ago.
Again I wish you good luck in climbing that ladder and wish you find a wife who has the same vision as you do. Because if she does not have the same vision, I have my reservations about your marrige also. |
|
34. 有殻蝸牛 2014-07-07 19:31:40
|
|
講真丫，以前大學得兩間，每年畢業生不足8000人，個個都係精英。依家政府好心幫年輕人，degree、asso、high dip幾廿樣，每年大專畢業生超過十萬人，如果依家嘅大學生個個拎自己同以前嘅大學生比較，一定好難過。如果只係講最top嗰8000個大學生，做5年嘢買市區上車盤10內夠full paid應該無問題。如果比較依家嘅大專生同以前嘅中學生，大家都係做十幾年嘢兩公婆一齊努力置業。
|
|
35. nobody 2014-07-07 22:58:36
|
|
你估錯了，我係呂大樂所講既第四代香港人，冇經歷過97年既好境，但而家都叫做有幾間樓，只係作為上一代同80後之間既中層管理人，我明白佢地既難處。 我買樓算係買得遲，結婚時買樓，首期係我三個月人工，如果當時買盡D，而家都上岸了。 你己經唔能夠回應我既論據，只能對我既說教，亦係反映你好彩早出身早退休唔使管人，白D講，同社會脫節。 上一代人真係完全唔明而家個世界，你地果時，就算揸的士，夠勤力一日做18個鐘，買個的士牌完全唔係問題，但而家，我估你一日做30個鐘都，儲20年錢都買唔到。 |
|
36. Alan Pepper 2014-07-08 01:45:38
|
|
Can you answer me this question though. Is my calculation not realistic? The 10 year plan. I'm not teaching you a lesson my friend. IM merely putting down a simple calculation that suggests it is indeed possible to buy a home in 10 years. And my calculations are extremely conservative don't you think?
You say you did not enjoy the benefits of 97, but during that time many people went bankrupt also. So you also didn't have to go through that stage? Be fair in your judgment please. |
|
37. Alan Pepper 2014-07-08 01:59:16
|
|
Many choices are made, not thrust upon them. I had a cousin who was passed on 2 taxi license from his father. He sold them and kept driving for 30 years and guess where he ended up? Meanwhile the person earning $1000 a month driving taxi bought his license for $200,000. He probably has 3 license by now and really retired. And you think that it was easy buying the license at $1,000 a month? God I don't know how he did it but sure wasn't easy.
My uncle had a salary of $2000 when he bought his first home of $200k, he also had to support his family of 8 back in China and that was easy? I don't think so. It had never been easy.
I'm sure you can understand that correct? Yes you should sympathize the young generation today but nobody made it here easily. You should encourage young people to work hard and at least give them a realistic goal, such as the realistic numbers I had suggested before. All achievable is it not correct?
Please just answer if the above calculation is achievable or not. And you really don't have to tell people it's hard, they know it's is hard and it has never been easy. |
|
38. Alan Pepper 2014-07-08 02:08:20
|
|
Oh by the way. I might be younger than you are and I work a 65 hour work week. I started work at the poorest time of Hong Kong and that was back in the late 90s. I also sympathize for the young people but I would like to encourage them to add value to themselves. Wouldn't you agree that the only way to improve their living is in their own hands? The government will not change, global economic system is not going to make itself suit their desires. And if hk does not remain competitive we will certainly be overtaken by other cities and countries. Wouldn't you agree this is the reality?
|
|
39. 睇得通 2014-07-08 10:37:56
|
|
我們希望香港出現秋前算帳,把鼓吹引導小朋友學生哥<佔領中環>學者/教授解僱,遞解出境.......永不錄用........
|
|
40. MM 2014-07-08 11:58:35
|
|
I'm after 70s. what's happened in HK now? It looks like history keeping to repeat. Perhaps, I cannot escape what my parents saw in year 1967. Hope that it would NOT be happened! Youngsters DON"T be bias! when you grow up, you would understand - listen different voices before making final decision.
|
|
41. nobody 2014-07-08 12:10:30
|
|
allan sir, 我就可以答你，你計錯數，因為你冇睇資產回報跑贏人力回報既問題。 你又重複用過去既數，又計一次，冇用的，只係反映你親戚好彩，以前的士牌可以做9成按，而家5成都唔做足。 真係好笑，做65個鐘就話自己勁，我上位之前試過一星期做100個鐘，之後我老闆就炒左癈柴60後，但老闆亦只係比佢6成既人工比我，我學歷，能力，工時都比佢好好多。 你真係一個冇見識，冇管理經歷，冇同理心既人，只以前好彩早出世。 |
|
42. nobody 2014-07-08 12:14:18
|
|
alan sir, 我係好多地方東南亞澳紐都做過，我估你冇咁既經驗，right? 講競爭力，香港唔駛咁多基建，反而係要多D自由，多D創新（至少唔好學CY連人地想做電視都唔比）。如果你冇學過經濟，咁去 google 下 law of diminishing return (回報遞減） |
|
43. 路過 2014-07-08 14:27:27
|
|
|
|
|
44. Alan Pepper 2014-07-08 23:37:40
|
|
To nobody:
Firstly I'm not here to compete with you in qualifications and experience here, but if you must know, I have an economics and accounting degree and hold an MBA, and I do have experience in North America, and although for a short time, some experiences in South East Asia. When I say 做65個鐘 I never meant 自己勁. It was a direct response to your assumption that I am 好彩早出身早退休唔使管人，同社會脫節. Again, I do think we are the same age.
Secondly, I do not think we have a different point of view, and again I do sympathise with the young generation, but I don't believe it will do them any good to tell them that life is difficult because they already know. I am only trying to use simple maths to show them that it IS possible to make it in Hong Kong. Just some encouragement to young people, that is all.
As far as I remember, I have not made any offensive remarks to you, so please refrain from offensive remarks at me. Thank you very much.
I hope you can become a mentor to the young people in this society. Teach them how to make it in this globalised world. Globalisation is coming whether we like it or not. Please let them know that this is the reality and help them protect themselves against it. Hong Kong does not have any natural resources and 資產回報跑贏人力回報 is the reality, unless we abolish land and property ownership. But the reality is, I do not see this happening in the near future, and that sounds awfully like the cultural revolution or extreme communism.
If you would like to discuss the flaws of capitalism there are literally hundreds of literature that have been discussed. And I am not ready to specialise in that subject.
Again, I'm not here to make enemy and if you keep posting insulting remarks I will have to assume you have other intentions other than constructive discussions. |
|
| |
|
|
